Case Dismissed Because Employee Lost His Temper at EEOC Mediation

Mediation has become an integral part of the EEOC administrative process. Mediation is the process by which a neutral third-party "mediator" helps the employer and the employee, on both sides of an EEOC charge, explore the possibility of settling the potential claims. It is not a mandatory process, but it can be a good alternative to litigation, especially when successful.

During an EEOC mediation, the mediator (who is not an active investigator on that charge) will travel back and forth between the different rooms where the opposing parties are situated with their attorneys. The mediator's task is to transfer offers and counteroffers back and forth between the parties. As with nearly all litigation, emotions run high at mediations as well. In the common effort to settle the case, the litigants are often called upon to re-live certain events which led to the charge, while making offers and responding to counteroffers. But what happens when those emotions cannot be contained?

Control your temper or you just might lose your case.

Last year, Michael Benes was participating in an EEOC mediation of his charge against his employer, A.B. Data Ltd., in Wisconsin. At the time, Mr. Benes was still an employee of the company. During the mediation, an offer was made by his employer that Mr. Benes was not happy with. He then proceeded to the mediation room where his employer was and shouted, "You can take your proposal and shove it up your ass and fire me and I'll see you in court!"

The employer took him up on his offer and terminated him after the mediation failed. Mr. Benes, of course, sued for retaliation because he was engaged in the EEOC process at the time of the firing, which is protected conduct. His employer subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the case, arguing that Mr. Benes had been fired because he disrupted the mediation, not because of the EEOC charge itself. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed.

Behavior at mediation can be grounds for termination.

The court in this case reasoned that Mr. Benes "sabotaged" the mediation. In fact, the court compared his actions to barging into his boss's office and shouting, which would likely be considered insubordination. The court determined that, since Mr. Benes could not cite a case holding that misconduct during a mediation "must be ignored," his employer was within its rights to terminate him for his conduct.

Was this a good decision?

It seems the court in Benes v. A.B. Date, Ltd. has determined that there is no privilege on the part of an employee to misbehave or engage in inappropriate behavior during mediation. However, many see a problem with this Seventh Circuit decision. Most, if not all mediation sessions in employment cases involve hot tempers and an excess of emotion. And, while it is true that we all need to remain civil, the consequences of losing one's temper should not include complete dismissal of one's case.

If you have any questions or concerns about EEOC mediation or any other issue regarding your employment, feel free to contact our firm either online or by calling us at (205) 265-1880.

Categories: EEOC Claim
Internet Marketing Experts The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship.